<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>RegNamespace Work Item Rss Feed</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/List.aspx</link><description>RegNamespace Work Item Rss Description</description><item><title>Created Feature: Update solution files to VS2010 [14054]</title><link>http://regnamespace.codeplex.com/workitem/14054</link><description>&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>ChrisGuzak</author><pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 20:07:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Feature: Update solution files to VS2010 [14054] 20100821080733P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: search</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=7335</link><description>needs search functionality, so it ties in with the search box and UI of Vista&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: jerryjoyce ** &lt;p&gt;It does tie in to the indexing functionality of Vista.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>jerryjoyce</author><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:28:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: search 20080821112835P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: search</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=7335</link><description>needs search functionality, so it ties in with the search box and UI of Vista&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>eidylon</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:10:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: search 20080818061013P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: Our name stinks...</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=805</link><description>Our name looks like it was picked by the Windows Live sentence naming committee.  How about a short name and a subtitle&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Proposals&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;RegSearch - Registry Viewer and Indexer for Windows Vista&lt;br /&gt;RegNamespace - &amp;#40;as above&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;...&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: eidylon ** &lt;p&gt;I like the RegNamespace one, though i think that should just be for the assembly or something&amp;#59; but use the full &amp;#34;Registry Namespace&amp;#34; for the human readable name&amp;#47;titles&amp;#59;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>eidylon</author><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:41:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: Our name stinks... 20071116074129P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: "Export" ability</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=4464</link><description>Great item&amp;#33; love it.  &amp;#58;&amp;#41;  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The only other thing i could really say would be a big help besides the ability to create new &amp;#40;as per other post&amp;#41; would be the ability to right click a key&amp;#47;value and &amp;#34;Export...&amp;#34; to a standard .reg file.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>eidylon</author><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:13:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: "Export" ability 20071116061314P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: Implement more context menu verbs</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=609</link><description>Add support for the following context menu verbs&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For keys&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;New Key&lt;br /&gt;New Value &amp;#40;of various types&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;Add to favorites&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For keys and values&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;Rename&lt;br /&gt;Delete&lt;br /&gt;Cut&amp;#47;Copy&amp;#47;Paste&lt;br /&gt;Properties&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This might need to be broken down into several work items.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: eidylon ** &lt;p&gt;absolutely i agree, that being able to add new keys&amp;#47;values is very important to make this a fully usable piece of software. &lt;/p&gt;</description><author>eidylon</author><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:10:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: Implement more context menu verbs 20071116061021P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: Implement more context menu verbs</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=609</link><description>Add support for the following context menu verbs&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For keys&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;New Key&lt;br /&gt;New Value &amp;#40;of various types&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;Add to favorites&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For keys and values&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;Rename&lt;br /&gt;Delete&lt;br /&gt;Cut&amp;#47;Copy&amp;#47;Paste&lt;br /&gt;Properties&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This might need to be broken down into several work items.&lt;br/&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: AR ** &lt;p&gt;This would be the &amp;#35;1 feature improvement by far.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would consider the ability to add Keys and Values most important, followed by cut&amp;#47;copy&amp;#47;paste functionality.  The other options would be nice, but don&amp;#39;t constitute basic functionality really needed to work with the registry.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rename&amp;#47;Delete functionality seems to have been implemented already.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>AR</author><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:33:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: Implement more context menu verbs 20070831013301A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: No way to restore removed desktop icon</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3215</link><description>Hi AR.  Deleting the icon doesn&amp;#39;t delete the registration - it ADDs a key modifying the SFGAO flags.  We need to add the removal of this key to the MSI so that uninstall&amp;#47;reinstall can get it back, as well as a remove message telling folks the needed steps to get it back.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Run this command to get it back.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;reg delete HKEY_CURRENT_USER&amp;#92;Software&amp;#92;Microsoft&amp;#92;Windows&amp;#92;CurrentVersion&amp;#92;Explorer&amp;#92;CLSID&amp;#92;&amp;#123;E48ABDCD-0DE7-4C5A-91EB-13D6E81506F0&amp;#125; &amp;#47;f&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;James&lt;br/&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: AR ** &lt;p&gt;I see that the install option regarding &amp;#34;hiding&amp;#34; does control whether it shows on the Desktop or not without effecting it&amp;#39;s appearance in explorer windows... so I partly take back my suggestion to have this option&amp;#33;  Only bonuses would be if it were clearer in the install that that is what the option did, and an interface to configure this behavior.  If it showed up with other system icons in the &amp;#34;Change Desktop icons&amp;#34; dialog &amp;#40;and was documented to be there&amp;#41;, that would be great&amp;#33;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>AR</author><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:21:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: No way to restore removed desktop icon 20070831012148A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: No way to restore removed desktop icon</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3215</link><description>Hi AR.  Deleting the icon doesn&amp;#39;t delete the registration - it ADDs a key modifying the SFGAO flags.  We need to add the removal of this key to the MSI so that uninstall&amp;#47;reinstall can get it back, as well as a remove message telling folks the needed steps to get it back.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Run this command to get it back.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;reg delete &amp;#47;f HKEY_CURRENT_USER&amp;#92;Software&amp;#92;Microsoft&amp;#92;Windows&amp;#92;CurrentVersion&amp;#92;Explorer&amp;#92;CLSID&amp;#92;&amp;#123;E48ABDCD-0DE7-4C5A-91EB-13D6E81506F0&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;James&lt;br/&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: JamesFinnigan ** &lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure about the repair option.  I generally don&amp;#39;t love it when repair chucks a bunch of my personalization.  This is still probably a reasonable choice for repairing, though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;sorry about the typo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree that would be nice - I&amp;#39;ll look into what it takes to appear in that list.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>JamesFinnigan</author><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:16:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: No way to restore removed desktop icon 20070831011630A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: No way to restore removed desktop icon</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3215</link><description>Hi AR.  Deleting the icon doesn&amp;#39;t delete the registration - it ADDs a key modifying the SFGAO flags.  We need to add the removal of this key to the MSI so that uninstall&amp;#47;reinstall can get it back, as well as a remove message telling folks the needed steps to get it back.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Run this command to get it back.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;reg delete &amp;#47;f HKEY_CURRENT_USER&amp;#92;Software&amp;#92;Microsoft&amp;#92;Windows&amp;#92;CurrentVersion&amp;#92;Explorer&amp;#92;CLSID&amp;#92;&amp;#123;E48ABDCD-0DE7-4C5A-91EB-13D6E81506F0&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;James&lt;br/&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: AR ** &lt;p&gt;OH, and when you add this to the setup, it would be good for the &amp;#34;Repair&amp;#34; option of course to remove this key, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For anyone who had the same problem and is reading this, the &amp;#34;&amp;#47;f&amp;#34; in the command line James supplied needs to go at the end for it to succeed.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>AR</author><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:08:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: No way to restore removed desktop icon 20070831120815A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: No way to restore removed desktop icon</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3215</link><description>Hi AR.  Deleting the icon doesn&amp;#39;t delete the registration - it ADDs a key modifying the SFGAO flags.  We need to add the removal of this key to the MSI so that uninstall&amp;#47;reinstall can get it back, as well as a remove message telling folks the needed steps to get it back.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Run this command to get it back.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;reg delete &amp;#47;f HKEY_CURRENT_USER&amp;#92;Software&amp;#92;Microsoft&amp;#92;Windows&amp;#92;CurrentVersion&amp;#92;Explorer&amp;#92;CLSID&amp;#92;&amp;#123;E48ABDCD-0DE7-4C5A-91EB-13D6E81506F0&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;James&lt;br/&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: AR ** &lt;p&gt;Thanks James.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would be nice if there was a way to hide the icon from actual Desktop, so it would only show up in Explorer &amp;#40;various system Desktop icons do this -- by default Computer, Network and Control Panel&amp;#41;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Take care,&lt;br/&gt;Asa&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>AR</author><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:03:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: No way to restore removed desktop icon 20070831120357A</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: No way to restore removed desktop icon</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3215</link><description>Hi AR.  Deleting the icon doesn&amp;#39;t delete the registration - it ADDs a key modifying the SFGAO flags.  We need to add the removal of this key to the MSI so that uninstall&amp;#47;reinstall can get it back, as well as a remove message telling folks the needed steps to get it back.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Run this command to get it back.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;reg delete &amp;#47;f HKEY_CURRENT_USER&amp;#92;Software&amp;#92;Microsoft&amp;#92;Windows&amp;#92;CurrentVersion&amp;#92;Explorer&amp;#92;CLSID&amp;#92;&amp;#123;E48ABDCD-0DE7-4C5A-91EB-13D6E81506F0&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;James&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>JamesFinnigan</author><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:34:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: No way to restore removed desktop icon 20070830093412P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED FEATURE: Create a COM abstraction over the registry APIs</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1269</link><description>Need to implement a COM object to abstract the reads/writes to the registry.  This will enable certain UAC scenarios by allowing the COM object to be run in the COM surrogate process. </description><author>jerryjoyce</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:34:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED FEATURE: Create a COM abstraction over the registry APIs 20070425093437P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED FEATURE: Add a custom search UI feature to support property based queries for the registry schema</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1130</link><description>Add a context menu verb on registry folder items that when invoked brings up a separate window hosting an Explorer Browser Control and some custom UI for query criteria. </description><author>jerryjoyce</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:30:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED FEATURE: Add a custom search UI feature to support property based queries for the registry schema 20070425093029P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED FEATURE: Add a column for Integrity level</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1102</link><description>Viewing the integrity level of a Registry Key. </description><author>JamesFinnigan</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:29:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED FEATURE: Add a column for Integrity level 20070425092932P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED FEATURE: Add support for other registry types</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=989</link><description>1) REG_RESOURCE_LIST
2) REG_RESOUREC_REQUIREMENTS_LIST
3) ??? </description><author>jerryjoyce</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:25:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED FEATURE: Add support for other registry types 20070425092546P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED FEATURE: Add enhancements to the binary editor</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=988</link><description>1) Undo capability (stack)
2) Cut/Copy/Paste
3) Memory mapped file vs array for internal binary data storage
4) Max size to support editing of DWORDs and QWORDs in binary. </description><author>jerryjoyce</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:25:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED FEATURE: Add enhancements to the binary editor 20070425092545P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: MSI needs revamping</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=827</link><description>We've discovered some issues with the MSI in the current release.  There's a dependency used in registration that isn't guaranteed to be installed at the point that it is used.

Possible fixes: 
* static link to the CRT in a msi-embedded dll that is only used for registration/unregistration (to limit the static linking badness).
* use a separate MSI to guarantee that the dependency is always already installed. </description><author>JamesFinnigan</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:21:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: MSI needs revamping 20070425092120P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: advertise</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=806</link><description>register with:

* http://gallery.live.com
* http://shellrevealed.com
* toolbox
* download.com

... ?

We'll need setup completed to do this... Comments: ** Comment from web user: JamesFinnigan ** Moved from deleted structure 1.01 Beta</description><author>JamesFinnigan</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:20:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: advertise 20070425092028P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: advertise</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/RegNamespace/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=806</link><description>register with:

* http://gallery.live.com
* http://shellrevealed.com
* toolbox
* download.com

... ?

We'll need setup completed to do this... </description><author>JamesFinnigan</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:20:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: advertise 20070425092027P</guid></item></channel></rss>